Rapist just given police caution for sex attack on girl
CHILD sex offenders and rapists have received a slap on the wrist by Dyfed-Powys Police instead of facing the courts.
New figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show that 33 people arrested for sexual offences were given cautions, reprimands, penalty notices and warnings between April 2009 and March 2010.
Shockingly, one offence listed as being dealt with in this way was the rape of a female child under the age of 13.
Eleven offenders escaped prosecution after sexually assaulting females aged 13 or over, as did three after sexually assaulting a child under the age of 16.
The director of children's charity Kidscape, Claude Knights, described the figures — particularly the rape incident — as disturbing.
She said: "Such sexual offences are very grave and have long-term effects on young victims. It is difficult for them to develop a sense of closure when the sentence given to the perpetrator does not reflect the severity of the crime.
"The message sent out to predators needs to be a very strong one, and sentences for these horrendous violations of children's innocence need to act as strong deterrents."
During the previous year 31 people in the Dyfed-Powys area were dealt with in the same way.
According to Home Office guidelines, police should give a caution to adults who admit they are guilty of first-time minor offences.
A caution is not a criminal conviction, but does result in a police record for five years.
A sex crime would also see an offender placed on the sex offenders' register.
A spokeswoman for Dyfed- Powys Police said cautions are given out depending on the circumstances of each incident and often due to an unwillingness on behalf of the victim to see the matter go to the courts.
"Dyfed-Powys police has historically recorded high levels of cautioning for certain categories of crime for a number of reasons," she said.
"Not least of these is that much of the crime which forms the greatest proportion of crimes within the force area, such as lower level thefts, assaults, possession of cannabis and so on, are committed by young offenders and due to the lower incidence of crime within the region, the force is able to intervene in such persons' patterns of offending at a much earlier juncture than might be the case in larger, urbanised and thus more anonymous communities.
"Cases with the potential to be resolved by way of caution are subject to additional scrutiny and two recent reviews confirm that our internal processes comply with national crime recording standards.
"As an added safeguard, cautions administered for the most serious, indictable offences are also scrutinised by the Crown Prosecution Service.
"It should be noted that often such outcomes arise because of the express wishes of complainants who are reluctant to progress matters to a court hearing."
chantelle.rees@swwmedia.co.uk







13 Comments
View all
by Jeff, Swansea, Wales
Tuesday, June 08 2010, 1:36AM
“£50 fine for decapitating people next.
Heather, stop going on about this "loony left" rubbish... as they say, if you don't like it here, *** off!”
by mike, swansea
Monday, June 07 2010, 11:35PM
“Fantastic!!!!! The idiots will be handing out fixed penalties for murder next!!!! Keep up the good work muppets!!!!”
by Heather, Mumbles
Monday, June 07 2010, 10:52PM
“So you, Philip, Swansea can fire insults, however, you can't take them back. Bit of a bad sport aren't you!
Don't forget, Philip, it is *you* who decided to personally insult *me* !”
by nicola, NEATH
Monday, June 07 2010, 7:42PM
“Just ignore her. She has a warped opinion on thing”
by Philip, Swansea
Monday, June 07 2010, 4:31PM
“Well as a Welsh person, living in Wales, reading a Welsh newspaper I took you're comment quite personally. And if you can't understand what appears to be a mentallity much like your own then I think you should seek social therapy immediatly.”
by Heather, Mumbles
Monday, June 07 2010, 4:15PM
“Philip, Swansea; I find it strange how you feel the need to revert to *personal* insults.
Why do you have the need to do that? Excuse my ignorance but I'm not really used to your mentality.”
by Philip, Swansea
Monday, June 07 2010, 3:49PM
“Ah yes, Heather of stabbing, shooting and drug-dealing London has come to ride upon her high horse, nose held high, mouth and finger-tips several yards ahead of her brain!”
by Heather, Mumbles
Monday, June 07 2010, 3:19PM
“Well why are people surprised? After all Wales is the land of the "loony lefties" isn't it? A land full of people whom support terrorism; a land of people whom support everybody but their own.
This doesn't surprise me in the least. This is Wales!”
by Philip, Swansea
Monday, June 07 2010, 2:38PM
“Steve and Simon - Thank you for nipping this one at the bud. A manipulative half-story that is sloppy journalism at it's finest.
All it takes are the disgruntled parents of a teenage sexual relationship to report the boy involved and this lad will automatically recieve a caution for statatory rape.”
by Steve, Swansea
Monday, June 07 2010, 1:49PM
“I think all contributors have missed the point of this story, to be honest, but so has the Post on this one.
Any case of sex involving a child under 13 is classified as rape because children of that age are deemed incapable of understanding what consent is. From 13 to 15, young people are able to understand consent but are not able to give consent until the age of 16.
The police usually use cautions in cases where the perpetrator is of a similar age and there is no abuse of trust. Is it really in the public interest to start charging 14 year-olds for sleeping together? I think not, and it appears that the police and CPS agree.
Did the reporter bother to find out the ages of those who received cautions, or did she just go for the easy headline?”