Meeting against gypsy site in Swansea forced to move venue after hundreds turn up

“Tofisgod! I am glad you brought up the issue about previous Melin Mynach travellers and their defecation of own excreta amongst general public areas so that the politically correct traveller supporting hypocrites and imbeciles can read about it. I am also glad of previous truthful newspaper reporting about the fly-tipping of tons of dug up driveway rubble, left over hardened tarmac, refuge, and anti social behaviour etc.

Apparently according to your average politically correct hypocrite the traveller subculture is more deserving of council tax payer money and preferential treatment because of an accusation of general public prejudice.

The question to these politically correct hypocrites, imbeciles, and supporters is? Do you think the totally sub-human act of repeat defecation of excreta and blatant refusal to clean up is something that will in itself cause prejudice. If not! Is it because that behavioural standard is something you condone, applaud, and accept as normal human behaviour or to perish the very thought………. Something you partake in yourself?”

“I can not wait for them to arrive and defecate in Penyrheol swimming pool again and use the facilities for washing. I also love used nappies left in the changing rooms such a delight to see.”

“The people of Gorseinon/Swansea should take their case to The European Court Of Human Rights because the loss of value on personal property/negative equity caused by someone else's unwanted and unasked for decision making is an infringement of basic human rights. Each and every decision maker, council, and council employee that decides on traveller site location(s) should be personally sued by each and every Swansea householder in the circumstance(s) where their property sees a loss in value. Justice for the ordinary decent people!”

“Dear Sir/Ms....... I send you a copy of letter sent to Swansea Civic Centre.




Gypsy & Traveller Consultation ,

City & County Of Swansea,

Room G5.2,Civic Centre,

Oystermouth Road,

Swansea,

SA1 3SN.




Date :--- 18 march 2013


Regarding the Gorseinon Permanent Gipsy & Travellers Site




Dear Sir, Ms




May I draw your attention to " The Law of Unintended Consequences ".




With the continuing stream of immigration, which is creating a demand for more and more house development nationally, to allow the creation of a gipsy & travellers PERMANENT SITE in the designated areas namely, Melin Mynach and the proposed Penyrheol Cemetery,would be a wrong move..




May I draw your attention the some of the law relating to the catering for gipsy & traveller needs .

http://tinyurl.com/cfew5fu




Page 17

6.2. Who is a Gypsy?

The question of who is a Gypsy has remained one of the most enduring of sedentary

obsessions that has attended Gypsies' long experience of discrimination in Europe.70

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the field of jurisprudence. The lead case on Gypsy

status before the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) was passed was that of R v South Hams

DC ex parte Gibb et al,71 a case which considered whether the Travellers involved could

be accepted as Gypsies for the purposes of the former site provision duty found in the

(now partly repealed) Caravan Sites Act 1968. Gypsies are defined in law as 'persons of

a nomadic habit of life, whatever their race or origin.'72 In assessing Gypsy status, the

Court of Appeal found the following matters to be relevant:




Page 18




6.3. Too ill to be a Gypsy?

In tandem with defining who is a Gypsy, the courts have also had to address the question

of whether an individual can lose her/his Gypsy status, particularly in relation to cases

where ill health has led to Gypsies and Travellers not being able to travel. Despite the

issues being considered in both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, some matters are

still far from clear.

Read on ..............


Page 19


Still too ill to be a Gypsy?

Soon after Berry was heard, the High Court once again considered a challenge to Gypsy

status in a planning matter in the case of O'Connor v the First Secretary of State and

Bath & NE Somerset.75 This time the case involved an Inspector's decision that the

Traveller concerned was not a Gypsy because she had become too ill to travel.

The judge decided that it was not enough, as the Inspector did in this case, to focus on the

travelling currently being undertaken or likely to be undertaken in the future, but the

Inspector should instead consider such circumstances as:

Read on..................


End

Further consider :---------




http://tinyurl.com/cx3mjvc

We're on our way to Britain: In a year up to 29 million Romanians and Bulgarians will have the right to settle in Britain and...




Quote ….And these gypsies in the slums of Sofia can hardly wait...Unquote







Consider this also :---------http://tinyurl.com/3xkk9lt

Quote.......France sends Roma Gypsies back to Romania ….....Unquote END




With open borders could Goresinon end up with droves of European Gypsies & Travellers. With more pressure to increase the size of the site to accommodate the increasing number that could turn up the local inhabitants picking up the tax bill”

“My view is no more caravan sites for these specially over priveliged groups and force them on to the council housing list like everybody else. That way they can spend 9 years waiting for assistance as tax payers are forced to.”