Councillor's plea for 'honest' debate about spending cuts
"IT'S going to be a tough year" is the message from every corner of the political map.
And it's no different in Swansea.
Darren Price, the only Plaid member of the administration, chairs Swansea Council's finance and performance overview and scrutiny committee.
The cross-party group of councillors is responsible for dissecting the council's financial agenda.
Mr Price said: "When the Conservative and Lib Dem UK Government announced its Comprehensive Spending Review last October, the message that came from it was loud and clear — public services are in for a tough time over the next few years.
"In Swansea, it will mean the council is set to receive less funding over the next few years.
"Added to the fact that we have unavoidable extra spending needs in areas such as child and family services and National Insurance costs, it means that Swansea Council needs to find over £16 million in savings in the next financial year alone, increasing to over £40 million by 2014/15.
"Clearly the council is doing all that it can to reduce management, administration and supervision costs, and finding efficiencies in its 'back-office' functions — with a target of finding over £7 million of savings in these areas next year.
"However, you cannot find the kind of savings that the council is looking for without affecting some services.
"I have called for quite some time for the need for the council to prioritise its services from the most important to the least important, and I was pleased that the Swansea Administration started this journey back in October, when it passed its 'statement of principles' for upcoming budgets — clearly stating that it wanted to prioritise direct pupil services (education), vulnerable people (social services) and street scene."
However, Mr Price said he was disappointed the principles and priorities were voted against by the whole of the council's Labour Party and the majority of the Swansea Conservatives.
Mr Price, who sits on the committee with Labour leader David Phillips, called on the opposition to engage in debate.
He added: "What was regrettable at that juncture was the fact that the Labour and the Conservative Opposition Groups not only failed to support those budget priorities, but more disappointingly failed to engage in the debate.
"Clearly, what is a priority for one person will not be a priority for another but at the very least, I would have expected the opposition groups to put forward alternatives or additions to the Swansea administration's suggestion, and had an open and honest discussion on the council's priorities.
"I personally believe that protecting the most vulnerable is a bedrock of any decent society, educating our children is another, and ensuring a clean and safe environment is expected of all local councils.
"Unfortunately, the reality of the UK Government's spending cuts mean that outside of these three priority areas, services will have to be cut.
"Special events budgets, leisure facilities, arts subsidies, sports and recreation subsidies and publicly funded floral displays are all being put forward as savings options for the next financial year.
"These are not areas that anyone wants to see cut, but in a world of limited resources, difficult choices need to be made.
"If, for example, the leader of the Labour group feels that more money should be spent on floral displays or given to arts organisations, as opposed to educating our children or providing social services care to our elderly, then clearly he needs to make those suggestions in an open forum.
"Over the next few weeks, there will be ample opportunity for opposition members to feed into the budget setting process and it is vital that they take that chance. It is simply not good enough to turn up on budget day with an alternative budget written on the back of a fag packet, without giving all members of Council the opportunity to scrutinise those proposals in detail.
"My plea to the opposition leaders is to bring forward possible changes which they would like to see as part of the council's scrutiny process, so that they have a realistic chance of being investigated and implemented.
"The people of Swansea deserve to see their elected councillors engaging in an honest and open debate, with the interests of taxpayers at the very heart of discussions."
helen.keates@swwmedia.co.uk







8 Comments
by Elfed, Swansea
Friday, January 21 2011, 10:07AM
“" .. cowardly anonymous web site called Inside Out Jaxxland, eh? Clearly Amazed has had a successful irony bypass.”
by amazed, swansea
Thursday, January 20 2011, 11:29PM
“I am totallyamazed at this article. Before the last Swansea Council Election in 2008 we had an unholy unofficial coalition alliance of PLAID CWMRU and Conservatives and Labour (PLC) in joint Opposition to the Lib Dems and Independents who were called the SA. When the SA won overall powwer at Swansea Council in 2008 and PLAID CWMRU lost four of their five seats (claiming "foul" against Labour at Cocket) Darren Price jumped from PLC to SA in order to get a Chair's £££ Allowance. Now he is the "Lone Ranger" without a "Kermit" as "Tonto" for Plaid Cwmru he attacks the ConLab coalition Opposition at Swansea Council. Can anyone in all of Swansea explain what is going on with the tiny rump of Plaid Cwmru remaining in Swansea? How about Peter Black AM, who knows everything, or that cowardly anonymous web site called "Inside Out Jaxxland", explaining what is going on with the "Party of Wales" - has the Party ended for them?”
by june, swansea
Thursday, January 20 2011, 9:22PM
“We will not get any honesty from swansea council. Cuts backs should come from the top, halve their salarys, expenses to a minium and to be look at all the time, the major can drive himself where he wants to go, workers should have a very heavy eye kept on them”
by Swivaldo, Swansea
Thursday, January 20 2011, 6:13PM
“There is no money in the pot. Residents will not stand for humungous council tax rises so efficiency savings are the only solution. Its no good elected councillors throwing their toys out of the pram for ideological reasons without producing alternatives. Too many councillors anyway and some are looking at the situation through tired eyes. Maybe fresh blood is needed”
by Observer, Neath
Thursday, January 20 2011, 1:37PM
“Perhaps Cllr Hedges - having highlighted what some of his priorities are - can tell us what are NOT his priorities? In other words, what would he and his Labour colleagues be prepared to see go/be closed down etc. to balance the books if they were in power?
And if its all to be achieved by 'efficiencies' can he explain just what those efficiencies would be, bearing in mind that the bulk of the council's spend is on pay etc? Comes down to jobs, doesn't it?”
by mike, Morriston
Thursday, January 20 2011, 1:30PM
“Whilst food safety and public health may not be considered a priority by the Lib Dems and Independents it is by some of us. Also it would help that instead of saying that increases were unavoidable that attempts were made to control them. A suggestion that the cabinet numbers be reduced to reflect the number of directors and that area planning committes be reduced from four to two has been ignored by the the administration”
by Mike Hedges, Morriston
Thursday, January 20 2011, 1:18PM
“Firstly the set of priorities excluded food safety and public health and whilst the Lib Dem and Independent administration do not think these are important some of us do. Perhaps it would also help if instead of saying expenditure was unavoidable that attempts were made to control it”
by John, Swansea
Thursday, January 20 2011, 9:34AM
“Once again we hear from Councilors that the people of Swansea diserve value for Money with regards also the Debit
Lets see the Wards extended which means less Councilors not 72 but 30
In line with future amount in the National Assembly”