Council housing hand-over is 'hollow win' for authority
COUNCIL tenants have voted to hand over their homes to a new landlord after a controversial ballot.
Campaigners who fought the transfer have condemned the outcome as a hollow victory for Neath Port Talbot Council.
-

Council leader Ali Thomas.
More than 9,300 houses and flats will no longer be the council's responsibility but will be run by not-for-profit landlord NPT Homes, which is already up and running in shadow form.
It's all to do with the Assembly's Welsh Housing Quality Standard. Neath Port Talbot argued it would need to spend £152 million bringing its homes up to scratch, when it only had £40 million.
Now the authority says tenants can look forward to a programme of repairs and improvements worth £152 million in the first six years and £694 million over 30 years.
Out of the 6,366 (61.6 per cent) of tenants who voted, 3,600 (56.6 per cent) supported the transfer and 2,758 (43.4 per cent) were against it. The total number of votes cast included eight spoilt ballots.
Council leader Ali Thomas said tenants had recognised the very difficult financial position facing the authority.
"While the council has always worked hard to provide good homes and services for its tenants, a lack of resources meant we simply could not afford to bring homes up to the WHQS," he said.
"NPT Homes will be able to deliver the repairs and improvements needed and we are confident they will deliver all the promises to tenants."
The Defend Council Housing campaign has fought the hand-over, with some Neath Port Talbot councillors also opposing it.
One of them, Dyffryn representative Martyn Peters, told the Post: "I've worked it out there's only about 1,000 votes in it. If you can call that a victory for the council then it's a hollow victory.
"A huge amount of money has been spent and all they've had is a 12 per cent majority."
Councillor Peters said it had been an unfair contest from the start, as the No campaigners had asked for the addresses of tenants so they could discuss the proposals with them — only to be refused.
Fellow anti-transfer councillor Keith Davies of Coedffranc said: "The council had something like £5 million to spend on their campaign while the No campaign had about £500 to spend.
"The decision is disappointing but some you win, some you lose. People have had their say and we will do the best we can for the democratic result."
A timetable for the transfer will now be drawn up.
NPT Homes' board chairman Phylip Richards described it as a great result.
"Tenants can rest assured the board is committed to delivering all the promises made to tenants during the consultation.
"We will be working hard to develop a detailed improvement programme over the coming months so we can deliver the full benefits of transfer to tenants from day one."
"I would like to thank tenants who have put their confidence in us. We are committed to delivering all the promises to our tenants and involving them in the investment and service improvements that transfer will bring."
paul.lewis@swwmedia.co.uk
Related articles:
Frustration at failure to address simplified guide to tenant plan







54 Comments
View all
by Tony, Bryncoch South
Monday, March 29 2010, 3:39PM
“In the fear that I will be attacked again I have to put this point over I have been out and about in the Carwern area today an about 12 people I spoke to said they voted NO I even met one council house holder who told me that he did not recive a ballot paper I asked why he had not contacted any body his reply was what's the point weather you voted by TXT ballot paper or other means which was available the no voters had no chance of winning as it was already decided”
by Anon, Anon
Sunday, March 21 2010, 11:02AM
“It's not just NPTCBC tenants who will regret this transfer ballot ever taking place, everyone in NPT will be affected by this.”
by Chris, Neath
Saturday, March 20 2010, 7:13PM
“Don't forget that the Council Ranger Service will now undoubtedly stop over the next few years.
This service was unique for sorting out anti-social behavior at council owned properties.
You YES voters will have a lot to answer to over the next few years!”
by HIS and HERS, Morfa
Saturday, March 20 2010, 5:22PM
“Do the people that voted YES. know that they now have NO right to buy there EX.council homes' they now come under PRIVATE LANDLORD's, you must have been mad to vote YES, Just look at other councils what they are now doing to there council home's ie - - - carmarthenshire voted NO. and they are now being upgraded , you will learn the hard way - -but its to late now . and rents will still go up as well , and you will have a few landlords to deal with now.. not as past practice - your local council and councillors could deal with the past council tenants, But not now.”
by Anon, Chity Sity
Saturday, March 20 2010, 3:37PM
“jeffery, dirtytown, come the elections I'd vote for the man with the orange face if I were you. Captian Beany I mean, not Hain”
by Linda, Neath
Saturday, March 20 2010, 1:47PM
“Hows about any DEMOCRACY jeffery - it is sadly lacking here where the whole place is run on cronyism and bullying.”
by jeffery, dirtytown
Saturday, March 20 2010, 1:42PM
“Hello ANAREUIN, NEATH , good comment about selective democracy. There are 26 families in the streeet where I live would give a 100% vote to have the road outside the houses fixed, CAN WE HAVE SELECTIVE DEMOCRACY”
by ANAREUIN, NEATH
Saturday, March 20 2010, 1:08PM
“Nobody seems to mention the fact that none of these houses actually belonged to the council.They never did belong to them they belonged to the people of Wales, council tenants and non-council tenants alike. The council is put there by us, the people, only to administrate on our behalf. Therefore, it follows that any vote to dispose of this precious asset should have been offered to the whole electorate of Neath Port Talbot. The council own nothing, It is US the people who own them. It's about time they were reminded of this”
by Tenant, Wales
Saturday, March 20 2010, 11:45AM
“A 'socialist' dictatorship? Don't make me laugh! There's nothing socialist about privatising council housing.”
by Anon, Neath
Saturday, March 20 2010, 11:31AM
“There was never a plan b, stock transfer was going ahead, by hook or by crook. Unison opposed it initially, but then jumped on board. Bought and paid for, eh chaps? Thats what you get when you vote Labour. A socialist dictatorship. Alas, they will win again in Neath, because the people here are brainwashed into voting Labour. Where else would Peter Hain get elected?”