Council dithering blamed for mast
A MOBILE firm says Swansea Council's dithering has once again resulted in a phone mast going up — despite the scheme being refused planning permission.
Vodafone bosses claim they did not receive an official notice in time, which ruled a transmitter in Gorseinon was not allowed to go ahead.
Residents, who say the mast is too near homes and fear it could damage their health, are furious.
Hazel Stock's Lime Street home is just 15 metres behind the towering mast.
She said: "If this mast has been allowed to stay up because of an administrative error then I am really angry. This mast is too close to residential areas and clearly should not be allowed to have been put up."
The plans for the 49ft tall mast, based in the grounds of Gorseinon RFC, have met with fierce opposition since they were first made public last year.
A petition was signed by hundreds in the community and objections were raised by the town council too.
People living near the mast said it would knock thousands of pounds off the value of their homes. And Gorseinon Infants School, which is just a few yards from the site, also voiced its fears over possible risks to health.
Last December, Swansea Council's planning committee refused to give planning permission.
But come August, locals were baffled when they saw contractors putting up the six-antennae mast.
Last month the work was finished.
And Vodafone insists it is in the right.
A spokesman said: "For a decision notice to be valid, the local planning authority must follow a two-stage process.
"They must firstly confirm whether their prior approval is required, or not. If it is required then they must give their decision on whether it is approved or refused. Swansea Council did not follow this process and we did not receive a valid decision notice within the 56-day time limit and accordingly we believe that we have planning consent."
Earlier this month, the Assembly's planning inspectorate said a phone mast in Townhill was allowed to stay because Swansea Council had missed a vital deadline by 24 hours.
Swansea Council, did not comment on whether a similar mistake had been made with the Gorseinon transmitter, but said it was Vodafone who were in the wrong.
A spokesman added: "We have recently issued a notice to the company requesting removal of the mast."







8 Comments
by sophie, gorseinon
Sunday, February 01 2009, 9:24PM
“I used to be able to see the old mast out my bedroom window and since it has gone I have not been able to recieve any signal, I think the mast should go up as now I cant get and signal in my house”
by James Sheridan, Swansea
Tuesday, October 14 2008, 12:36PM
“At a MATCHO meeting in Townhill/Mayhill I attended last week, I made reference to the Townhill Mast. Councillors David Hopkins and Peter May were present. They did not mention that Vodaphone had used the same 'ploy', non arrival of the Area Planning Committees Notice, with regards to the Gorseinon Mast nor did they answer my repeated requests of what would be happenning to the Townhill Mast i.e. Would it be coming down?
Therefore, now two communities are left in limbo. We cannot blame the Councillors for not supporting residents in the first instance, as a collevtive. However, little seems to have been done to Lobby our National Governments to change the law of Masts erection, to take into considerstion the concerns of most residents regarding health and the environment.
Jim Sheridan”
by Steve, Mayals, Swansea
Monday, October 13 2008, 2:36PM
“Hi Martin. I agree that large companies offer employment. I was not arguing to the contrary. My point was merely to point out that unless companies operate in a responsible way, they can also be the cause of tremendous damage. I remember once visiting an internet cafe while on business in Taipei, the capital Taiwan. It was quite late, so I was surprised to see so many teenagers there playing video games. I asked the proprietor if the kids played violent games. He replied that they were not allowed to. I then asked was this a Taiwanese law, and replied no, but internet cafe owners had a responsibility to the society. If kids stated to emulate the action in the videos or took unhealthy role models the whole society would be adversely effected. I thought, now here is capitalism at its best - with responsibility. In the UK, no company would temper their profits unless regulated by the government. Here, it's all about what can I get and screw the rest - and we see the results on our streets every night! Taiwan, on the other hand, offers a very safe environment. During my stay in Taipei, I never saw drunk youth. In fact, everyone I spoke to was very helpful and generous with their time. Now I put it to you, are UK youth born with more anti-social genes than their counterparts in Taiwan or is it that the influences they experience in life less nurturing here than in Taiwan? Personally, I think companies like Vodofone should act in a responsible way as do the Taiwanese. They were aware that they their planning application had been refused, but they choice to ignore it - and this was not merely a nymby response, as the refusal was from the city council, not the local street owners. However, I agree that the council needs a clear policy on mobile phone masts. They are a necessary evil, and so the council should offer alternatives to placing them in high density housing areas. Anyway, Martin, thanks for raising some good points. As a society, it is healthy to discuss issues that effect us all. Cheers.”
by Martin, Swansea area
Monday, October 13 2008, 11:56AM
“Sorry to disagree Steve but Swansea don't actually have a coherent policy when it comes to mobile phone masts. As a result, companies like Vodafone will employ specialists to exploit loopholes. Capitalism is not a river but a circulatory system whereby profits are reinvested into business so that they can create growth and sustain employment. By comparison, public bodies like local authorities are sinkholes into which our money disappears regardless of perfomance or professional ability.”
by Steve, Mayals, Swansea
Monday, October 13 2008, 10:49AM
“It is arrogance because our elected officials had already denied planning permission for this mast and Vodafone took advantage of the council's tardiness to go against our wishes. A responsible company would not act in this way. And, please don't excuse the company by saying 'that's business', because it is just this sort of myopic attitude that has caused global warming and the current financial crisis. Capitalism is like a river. When controlled and harnessed, it nourishes and benefits the land, but when left uncontrolled it creates havoc and destruction.”
by Martin, Swansea area
Monday, October 13 2008, 7:50AM
“This doesn't surprise me. Swansea Council planning department already has one of the worst reputations in Wales when it comes to supporting business. It is only natural that their administration systems would be equally useless.”
by me, home
Monday, October 13 2008, 7:22AM
“why is this arrogance? if the council has not followed procedure but blames vodafone for installing the mast then which party is being arrogant? the only reason that vodafone would install an expensive mast anywhere is owing to there being a demand for an improved service to its customers in an area - if all mobile users in the area wish to be without masts then please stop using your mobile phones - NIMBY attitudes as usual.”
by Steve, Mayals, Swansea
Sunday, October 12 2008, 2:13PM
“What utter arrogance! Vodafone needs to remember that the people it is trampling on are its potential customers. I certainly will not use this company's services in the future as protest over this incident.”