Backlash prompts Llanelli MP's expenses rethink
LLANELLI MP Nia Griffith has pledged never to eat at taxpayers' expense again after an angry reaction to her food bills.
Last year, Ms Griffith claimed the maximum £4,800 for food, and has been named and shamed alongside 31 other MPs who did the same.
Even when the House of Commons wasn't sitting, they claimed the full £400 a month under the allowance scheme, which was meant to cover eating expenses accrued while staying away from their main residence, on parliamentary business.
The revelations sparked a backlash from critics who feel MPs, who have a minimum salary of £64,766, not to mention all the other allowances, should at least be able to pay for their own grub.
Now Ms Griffith points out she didn't break any rules, but has announced she won't be claiming for food again.
She said: "A few weeks ago, I voted for an interim measure to reduce it immediately to £25 per night for nights actually spent away from your main home, but it should, quite frankly, be abolished. So I have decided not to claim it in future."
Now it has also emerged that Ms Griffith claimed £9,533 in legal fees and stamp duty while purchasing her new London home shortly after becoming an MP in 2005. She has since claimed £2,270 for a "complete redecoration" of the flat, designated her second home, and at least £4,000 on furnishings, electrical goods and furniture.
She said: "I claimed for the stamp duty when I bought a flat in London, which is within the rules, as an allowable expense, and the money does at least go back to the Treasury."
But she accepted: "I do think there is a problem if property prices rise and MPs are seen to be making a profit on a property they have purchased with taxpayer subsidy.
"I therefore think that any profit made should go back to the taxpayer."
*See this week's Llanelli Star for the full story











5 Comments
by OAP, Llanelli
Friday, June 26 2009, 1:10PM
“Well you are on about the MP But what about the Plaid AMs , They claimed a few thousand pounds as well, Cardiff - 60 miles away. the MP is over 200 miles away. and what about the MEPs. sort that out.”
by Stephen Roberts, Llanelli
Wednesday, June 24 2009, 4:35PM
“In her expenses is a claim for £2,348.83 for the website niagriffiths.org.uk. The only problem is that the website has references to the Labour party and a subscription service to Labour related material. The rules are quite clear: No party political material is permitted in any part of a publication or website funded wholly or in part from the allowance. You must not use party logos or slogans.”
by JOHN, dalry
Wednesday, June 24 2009, 4:13PM
“Despite having a heavily subsidised "canteen" she still claimed a food allowance roughly equal to the single old age pension. In the circumstances will she now campaign for a major increase in the old age pension ie more than Gordon Brown's earlier attempt of 50 pence per week.”
by Bob Hinton, Kidwelly
Wednesday, June 24 2009, 3:45PM
“Dear Sir,
Turning the pages of history the other day I came across the following. A man was being interviewed and this is what he said.
¿To tell you the truth it was easy. Our language made it easy¿
Asked to explain he went on:
¿My fellow officers and I coined our own name for our language, we called it ¿office talk¿. In office talk you deny responsibility for your actions. So if anybody says, ¿Why did you do it?¿ you say ¿I had to¿. ¿Why did you have to?¿ ¿Superiors Orders. Company Policy. It¿s within the law¿
The man being interviewed was Adolph Eichmann and he was being asked if it was easy to send tens of thousands of people to be murdered.
That bit about it being ¿within the law¿ rings a bell!”
by evans, ammanford
Wednesday, June 24 2009, 3:36PM
“At least she was 200 miles away,some county councillors
need expenses to survive
20 miles away.”